In the last 2 weeks, 2 events of great personal interest occurred. First, I was fortunate enough to have finally qualified for health care insurance from my current employer after nearly a decade of going without it. Second, the likelihood that most currently uninsured Americans will soon share my good fortune in regards to access to affordable health care insurance has increased after the U.S House of Representatives passed the Senate’s version of President Obama’s Patient Protection and Affordable Healthcare Act 2 Sundays ago; the president subsequently signed the bill into law the following Tuesday after its Congressional passing.
Because of my own experiences of having to go without healthcare coverage due to its inaffordability, the latter event marked a coming to pass of a policy which I have personally felt to be a societal necessity ever since I, as a 6th grader in the 1970s, remember asking one of my favorite teachers, “Why can’t poor people go to the hospital for free?”
While Americans—both poor and well-to-do alike—may not get free healthcare as a result of the bill, we will get the next best thing…the right (notice I didn’t say “opportunity”) to affordable healthcare, as well as holding traditional private insurance providers more accountable when they treat their policy holders like red-headed stepchildren. Among the heretofore unknown benefits of the new law include:
-Adult children of insured parents are now able to stay on their parents’ policies until they are 26 years of age, helping to reduce the number of college students without coverage.
-Insurance companies will now be prohibited from dropping (canceling your policy) if you become ill.
-Children (and by 2014, adults) will be prohibited from denying health care coverage because of pre-existing conditions.
-Insurance companies will no longer be allowed to cap coverage on expensive care due to long- lasting illnesses.
SOCIALISM!
ReplyDeleteBeyond,
ReplyDeleteI'm confused by your name. It doesn't seem like you're beyond the political spectrum at all. It seems like your spot on it is pretty obvious.
Actually, if you read my postings, they are all pretty much "over the map." Abortion is wrong, and so is putting criminals to death in the name in the state (an anti-abortion stance is typically a conservative notion, while an anti-death penalty stance tends to be a notion of the liberal left. Providence alone brought us here and Providence should be allowed to remove us...killing is wrong, period). I do not believe that a person's right to own guns should be limited in any way. In fact, gun ownership SHOULD be a legal right by those who are legally qualified to do so. The list goes on. If you can presume that I belong to one particular ideological branch of the spectrum, then more power to you. My observation about social, economic, and political policies are based on pragmatism, not some narrow ideological bent. I find liberals to be too open to an "anything goes" perspective, while conservatives are too sanctimonious and self-righteous. So you see my dear, I am BEYOND the limited thinking of dogma. Please take the time to read past postings to see if you can accurately pigeon-hole my "spot."
ReplyDelete